Apocalyptic

Immanentizing the Webschaton

Category: Uncategorized

  • Like a Lead Balloon

    Like a Lead Balloon

    It’s been clear from just about the start that the Trump Administration and the MAGA movement are going down, and probably going down hard, and that the real issue is how many of us they’re going to drag along with them.

    A lot of this is actually consistent with the catastrophism and apocalyptic worldview of the MAGA movement that is a large part of Trump’s animating power: The QANON-level conspiracy thinking, the global warming denial, the racist immigrant-invasion theory, the fake Christianity, the scapegoating promulgated by right-wing influencers (culture wars, grievance culture) that facilitates the economic exploitation of the precariat & working class.

    This last-stand/good-vs-evil shitshow of a narrative enables the worst wannabe-authoritarianism … the unitary executive/monarchist power plays led by the Vought/Miller/Gorka cabal; the regressive deregulatory agenda and data-mining grift of the Elon Musk/DOGE/broligarch cabal, with their faux “efficiency” narrative; and the face stuffing and trough feeding of the Trump organization and its foreign emoluments, hotels, golf courses, market gaming, and, of course, its crypto scams.

    It’s stupid, it’s illegal, its born to fail, they’re grabbing as much as they can while they can, damaging as much as they can while they can.

    One of the tragedies of this moment is that a lot of what sucks about the failings of pre-Tea Party elephant/donkey politics in the U.S. — such as warmongering, de-industrialization, corporatism, wealth concentration, debt crisis, health care crisis, etc. — are actual, real problems. These cynical political operators are exploiting that genuine need for change as a cover story for their grifts, power grabs and economic scams.

    The Trumpist MAGA movement is born to fail exactly because it will fail to address these real issues. It’s going to get worse, not better. Trump is not addressing the issues with any seriousness. Instead, it’s all dick-swinging, bravado, bullshitting and power plays.

    Trump has both houses of Congress and has packed the courts. And yet his work is in large part not succeeding. So many of his signature policies he’s attempting to declare through EOs rather than going through the existing methods of creating policy — compromise, legislation, etc. — and they’re running headlong into the wall, again and again.

    Tariffs? He rushed them through via EOs, and now the bipartisan judiciary, via Bush, Reagan and Obama appointees, are shutting them down. Why didn’t he go through Congress?

    DOGE? A joke. The Institute of Peace even reclaimed their HQ and put their sign back up. Why didn’t he go through Congress? They have the appropriations powers. All we have now of DOGE is data mining by Big Ballz. Trump could have done a proper audit of a myriad agencies and shepherded it through Congress and had actual policy outcomes.

    The only thing he’s really able to visibly and lastingly enact is revenge, Mafia-style rewards for his sycophants (see: presidential pardons), and ICE activities, which even the actually weaponized DOJ admits has circumvented due process.

    All of these things could have gone through a more vetted and stable route through a friendly Congress and had much larger impact over time. Instead he’s rushed it through in displays of unitary executive power pushed by the likes of Vought, Gorka and Miller, his policies are being rolled back, and it seems that he’s setting up a massive groundswell grassroots backlash that may transform working-class, internationalist and human-rights politics for the long-haul.

    (And I don’t mean the left equivalent of the Tea Party, which may or may not be a good thing for the moribund Democrats, but I digress.)

    All he has left at this point—beyond the insane amount of money he and his family and cronies are making off crypto and illegal foreign emoluments deals—is declaring a state of emergency against protesters, which would be even more of a disaster. He could certainly count on the division that this would provoke, directly in the armed forces. And that’s what I mean by him and his cronies going down and dragging the rest of us with him. That’s the kind of reckoning that would be bloody, but one that our small-d democratic culture has the means to survive and arise from stronger than ever.

    Or he could undertake the hard work of collaborating with a for-now friendly all-GOP Congress to pass actual legislation. Maybe this will happen with the “big beautiful bill”—an infantile nomenclature that reflects the infantile level of “discourse” in our political life—and maybe he’ll learn from that and start working within the norms of good governance.

    But even that BBB will provoke political response. That’s just politics. That’s normal. And he doesn’t want that. Yeah, I’ll take politics as usual any day over a Reichstag Fire or other emergency-powers excuse. But will his vanity permit such a happy outcome as an actual political contest? Or is he going to keep speeding down the authoritarian highway? Maybe this is a matter of TACO. Or maybe he’ll go full kamikaze — what’s he got to lose?

    He’s going down either way, and again, what really matters is how many of us he drags along with him.




  • Nonviolence fucking matters.

    Nonviolence fucking matters.

    You’re at a protest. Someone shows up and wants to smash some shop windows.

    Whether they’re an earnest knucklehead or something far more sinister doesn’t matter — tell them to fucking stop.

    As we head into a day of protest — April 5, 2025 — across the United States, I think about how effectively violence is used to the dual purpose of delegitimizing the political intention and moral imperative of the protestor — and likewise to destroy and scatter the protest movement.

    In the first case, that of delegitimization, we can look at the Black Lives Matter protests of 2020 and the fact that they were overwhelmingly peaceful: Of more that 7,750 protests from May to August 2020, 93% did not involve violence, vandalism, etc.

    Yet there is a public perception, at least in some sectors, of those protests as a mass of chaotic riots and destruction.

    This reading of the record and the data is at best maximalist distortion, and propaganda at worst, and in either case enables extremists to publicly disregard, deny, denigrate and propagate lies about the purpose of the protest movement and its participants.

    Agents provocateurs add fuel to the fire. A brief survey of Internet search results provides a bunch of interesting links:

    • An article on the Waging Nonviolence website takes a historical look at how instigators infiltrated protest movements in the United States.
    • A MarketWatch article reports on a Federal investigation on domestic extremists and foreign agents engaging in incitement and destructive acts to turn public sentiment against 2020 police-brutality protests.
    • A 2024 report in Politics & Rights Review, a Canadian academic journal, goes into detail on the use of agents provocateurs in Europe to “erode democracy and free speech.”
    • A 2021 book, How Agent Provocateurs Harm Our Movements, from the International Center of Nonviolent Conflict, offers “some historical examples and a few ideas on reducing the risk” … it’s available for free as a PDF download.

    It’s more than just using agents provocateurs to delegitimize protest, of course. It’s also about enabling authoritarian reaction.

    Remember, kids: This is Kyle Rittenhouse and George Zimmerman and January 6 country — all exonerated by the courts and government.

    They, and legions of like-minded stochastic individuals and regular, irregular, authoritarian and paramilitary group configurations, can’t fucking wait for a protestor to throw the first — or even second — punch.

    In the face of this ravenous appetite, nonviolence amounts to a radically transformational confrontation with abusive power.

    In our vengeful, rage-addicted, punishment-obsessed society, Martin Luther King Jr.’s 6 principles of nonviolence comprise a truly radical text, even in their most basic, once-sentence iteration. I reprint them here in summary:

    • Nonviolence is a way of life for courageous people. 
    • Nonviolence seeks to win friendship and understanding. 
    • Nonviolence seeks to defeat injustice, not people. 
    • Nonviolence holds that suffering can educate and transform. 
    • Nonviolence chooses love instead of hate. 
    • Nonviolence believes that the universe is on the side of justice. 

    Nonviolence fucking matters.

  • ‘Ich Bin Ein Berliner’

    ‘Ich Bin Ein Berliner’

    [EDIT, 4/5/25: The Tesla Takedown protests are indeed using this strategy of regularity to establish the moral case and physical presence of dissent in the United States.]

    If you’re interested in ways to bring down an authoritarian regime, here’s a little bit of history via our pals at Wikipedia:

    The Monday Demonstrations: Berlin, 1989

    “The Monday demonstrations (German: Montagsdemonstrationen in der DDR) were a series of peaceful political protests against the government of the German Democratic Republic (GDR). The demonstrations began in Leipzig on 4 September 1989, starting the Peaceful Revolution in the GDR: the fall of the Berlin Wall, the collapse of the government, and German reunification.

    “The demonstrations took place in towns and cities around the GDR on various days of the week from 1989 to 1991. The Leipzig demonstrations, which are the best known, took place on Mondays.[1] The protests are conventionally separated into five cycles …”

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monday_demonstrations_in_East_Germany

  • Phil Ochs, “The Power & The Glory”

    But this land is still troubled by men who have to hate
    They twist away our freedom and twist away our fate
    Law is their weapon and treason is their cry
    You can stop them if you try.

  • Some modest proposals for radical reform.

    Abolition of the Presidency.

    Maximum wage.

    Self-government by mutual consent.

    Organize mutualist community around bioregions.

    If money = speech, then the First Amendment is a mandate for the redistribution of wealth.

    Cooperative buyouts of industry, banking, mass media, agriculture, medicine.

    “Half Earth” …

    (Filler content as we immanentize the webschaton; thank you for your patience.)